Share this Story
Monuments and Morality
Dr. Levi Tenen explored how public sites shape our values during a lecture hosted by the Robert Nusbaum Center
University News | November 25, 2025
Tenen pointed to local examples from Coastal Virginia and beyond, including the Confederate Memorial in Portsmouth and the Robert E. Lee Monument in Charlottesville. How should communities design or reinterpret sites with such vexed histories? How can we form a consistent approach when historical pride, personal attachment, and ethical discomfort converge?
Tenen’s intuitive, engaging approach guided the audience through these thorny questions. He explored the difficulty of determining the original intention behind a monument and the ethical implications that follow. And while monuments may harm communities today, Tenen argued that harm is not all that matters. Instead, “Let’s examine the monuments on their own,” he urged. "When we’re forced to look up to it, we’re forced to exalt it. Confederate monuments are problematic because they celebrate the Confederacy."
So, should we take them down or leave them up? Tenen suggested a new possibility: “We can change monuments’ expressive properties by altering them or by adding new art.” Covering a monument can express shame and new monuments can critique existing ones, as seen in the MLK Memorial in Washington, D.C. and Fearless Girl in New York City. “Sometimes,” Tenen suggested, “the best way to remember vexed histories is through open critique and public dialogue.”
Dr. Tenen, who also coordinates the University’s Ethics Bowl Team, conducts research at the intersection of ethics, political philosophy, and environmental law. This semester, he is teaching the inaugural course “Art, Monuments, and Morality” at VWU, continuing his exploration of how public sites shape—and challenge—our shared values.
Learn more about the Robert Nusbaum Center at VWU.